Today marked the closing arguments in the highly anticipated Musk v. Altman trial, with a dramatic and unpredictable conclusion. Steven Molo, Musk’s lawyer, struggled to present a coherent case, stumbling over his words and making critical errors, including mistakenly referring to co-defendant Greg Brockman as ‘Greg Altman’. Furthermore, Molo incorrectly claimed that Musk was not seeking financial compensation, only to be corrected by the judge.

In contrast, OpenAI’s lawyer, Sarah Eddy, presented a meticulous and well-organized rebuttal, methodically arranging the extensive evidence introduced by the company in chronological order. This stark contrast in presentation style has left many questioning the merits of Musk’s legal claims.

Photo by Deesarkee photos on Pexels
Photos provided by Pexels