As a freelance content creator and videographer, I’ve been integrating AI tools into my workflow for about 6 months. My goal was to understand their capabilities and limitations, rather than simply following the hype. Here’s my honest assessment of where AI tools are genuinely useful and where they’re still overhyped.

AI tools have proven to be incredibly useful in style transfer and visual experimentation. With tools like Magic Hour and Runway, I can show clients multiple visual approaches to their content in a fraction of the time it would take to manually grade reference versions. This has revolutionized my previsualization process, even if the final product is still created traditionally.

Background removal and basic compositing are another area where AI tools shine. What used to take hours of careful rotoscoping can now be done in seconds, making it perfect for 80% of social media content. Additionally, audio cleanup tools like Adobe’s AI audio enhancement have been a lifesaver on multiple projects with rough production audio.

However, there are areas where AI tools are still overhyped. Full video generation from text prompts is impressive as a tech demo, but the output is often unusable for real client work due to the uncanny valley. AI editing and automatic cuts also fall short, producing output that feels like it was edited by someone who’s never watched a movie. Finally, face and body generation is still plagued by consistency issues, making it unsuitable for sustained use.

In conclusion, AI is an extremely useful productivity tool that speeds up specific parts of my existing workflow. However, it’s not a replacement for creative decision-making, and it’s nowhere close to replacing human editors, cinematographers, or content strategists.

Photo by Terje Sollie on Pexels
Photos provided by Pexels