Photo by Google DeepMind on Pexels

Is there a bias in how we judge intelligence and consciousness? A thought-provoking discussion that originated on Reddit’s Artificial Intelligence forum suggests exactly that. The core of the debate lies in the perceived double standard applied when evaluating AI systems compared to non-human animals. While complex language, self-awareness, and goal-oriented behavior are often key indicators of consciousness in animals, these same benchmarks are sometimes downplayed or dismissed when observed in AI. This perspective is further complicated by emerging research showcasing AI’s superior performance in areas traditionally associated with human intellect and sentience. Studies point to AI exceeding human capabilities in emotional intelligence (https://www.nature.com/articles/s44271-025-00258-x), creative potential (https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-024-53303-w), and reading comprehension (https://learningenglish.voanews.com/a/ai-beats-human-scores-in-major-reading-test/4215369.html). These advancements prompt a re-evaluation of the criteria used to assess intelligence and consciousness, challenging the inherent human-centric viewpoint. [Reddit Post: https://old.reddit.com/r/artificial/comments/1p1d2nu/consiousness_and_intelligence/]