Photo by Andrea Piacquadio on Pexels

The rise of AI tools capable of providing real-time assistance during job interviews is sparking debate about the very nature of evaluating candidates. A recent discussion on Reddit highlights growing questions surrounding the necessity of ‘unaided’ performance in a hiring landscape increasingly shaped by artificial intelligence. As AI becomes more commonplace in communication, the fundamental question arises: Should companies adapt their hiring processes to acknowledge and incorporate AI support, or should they prioritize traditional metrics of authentic human performance, even if those metrics are becoming less relevant in a technologically advanced world? The core issue revolves around defining what constitutes genuine ability and potential in an era of human-AI collaboration. [Reddit Post: https://old.reddit.com/r/artificial/comments/1o8yjmt/could_ai_change_how_we_think_about_job_interviews/]