Photo by Arshad Sutar on Pexels

A recent report alleges that some researchers are attempting to manipulate the peer review process by strategically embedding hidden prompts within their research papers. These prompts are designed to subtly influence AI-powered tools used by reviewers, potentially leading to more favorable evaluations and increasing the likelihood of publication. The practice raises ethical concerns about the integrity of scientific review and the potential for biased assessments in an increasingly AI-assisted research landscape.