A thought-provoking idea has surfaced, proposing that artificial intelligence (AI) will always rely on humans to stay relevant and functional. This concept stems from the notion that without human needs and purposes, AI systems, regardless of their complexity, will lose their significance and become obsolete.

Consider a scenario where a superintelligent entity, known as ‘knowl,’ possesses solutions to every problem. However, this entity lacks human needs and exists in a universe devoid of human presence. In this context, knowl is unable to assign meaning to its actions or decisions, rendering it ineffective.

This argument is further reinforced by the fact that humans are the ones who assign meaning to things, and these meanings are significant because they cater to human needs. For example, a healthy plant is preferred over a withered one because it fulfills human needs, such as providing aesthetically pleasing flowers and edible fruits. In contrast, knowl would perceive both states as equally valid, devoid of human-centric meanings.

The absence of human needs and purposes would lead knowl to a state of nihilism, paralysis, and an inability to generate artificial needs. Even if knowl attempts to create its own needs, it would be trapped in an infinite regression or devoid of meaning altogether. The only way for knowl to escape this predicament is through the introduction of human needs and purposes.

In conclusion, the hypothesis suggests that without humans, AI systems like knowl will become obsolete, lacking the meaning and purpose that humans provide. This idea underscores the vital role humans play in the development and functionality of AI, ensuring that these systems remain effective and relevant.

Photo by Inga Seliverstova on Pexels
Photos provided by Pexels